graphic
US Charter Schools spacer
Home|Login|Register
graphic graphic
     Advanced graphic
 
OverviewspacerNewsspacerCommunityspacerState ProfilesspacerFederal SupportspacerResources
graphic
spacer In This Section
graphic
arrowThe Federal Role
arrowGuidance
arrowResearch & Reports
arrowNCLB Guide
graphic
spacer
graphic
spacer
graphic
Did You Know?
Under the NCLB Act, persistently low-performing schools may be converted to charter schools as an option for restructuring them.

Source: State of the Charter School Movement 2005

graphic

 

spacer spacer
image print
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

Click here for PDF version

Charter Schools and Students with Disabilities:
A National Study


FINAL REPORT
2000

Prepared for:

Office of Educational Research and Improvement
U.S. Department of Education
Washington, D.C.

Thomas A. Fiore
Lessley M. Harwell
Westat

Jose Blackorby
Kara S. Finnigan
SRI International


U.S. Department of Education Statement

This study was funded by the U.S. Department of Education under Contract No. RC-97-11-0301. The content does not necessarily reflect the views of the Department or any other agency of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part for educational purposes is granted. The full text of this publication is available at the Department's home page at http://www.ed.gov

This study was not intended to measure compliance by public charter schools with applicable federal requirements for educating students with disabilities. The limited documentation in this report of ways in which students with disabilities were excluded from, or poorly served while attending, public charter schools may indicate violations of federal law. However, such determinations were beyond the scope of this study.

In addition, great care must be taken regarding the possible policy implications of this study. First, the data collection for this study was conducted prior to the effective date of the federal regulations implementing Part B of the IDEA, which include specific provisions regarding students with disabilities attending charter schools. The relevant regulations are set out in Appendix A to this study. In addition, in May 2000, the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights published a set of questions and answers regarding the application of federal civil rights laws to public charter schools that includes several questions about the education of children with disabilities. This document is available by contacting the Office for Civil Rights or by visiting their web site at http://www.ed.gov/offices/OCR/

Contents

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

INTRODUCTION

PART I - DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
  Site Selection
  Site Visit Procedures
  Data Analysis

PART II - OVERVIEW OF VISITED SCHOOLS
  Localism
  Evolution
  Facilities
  Curriculum and Instruction
  Staffing and Leadership
  Students

PART III - FINDINGS REGARDING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Why Parents Enroll Their Children with Disabilities in Charter Schools:
  Students Attitudes Toward Enrolling in a Charter School
  Pre-admission Counseling Related to Disability

How Charter Schools Serve Students with Disabilities:
  Identifying Students with Disabilities
  Instructional Setting
  Instruction
  Related Services
  Transportation
  Overview of Differences between Charter and Non-Charter Schools

Outcome Goals for Students:
  Differences Between Goals for Students With and Without Disabilities

Assessment of Student Outcomes:
  Differences Between Assessment for Students With and Without Disabilities

The Success of Charter Schools with Students with Disabilities:
  Anecdotal Evidences of Success
  Some Limits to Success
  Integration
  Facilitators of Success
  Barriers to Success

PART IV - CONCLUSIONS
General Conclusions About Charter Schools

Conclusions Related to Students with Disabilities:
  Enrollment Decisions
  Attitudes Toward Special education and Students with Disabilities
  Identifying Students with Disabilities
  Academic and Related Services
  Assessment and Accountability
  Evidence of Student Success
  Factors Affecting Student Success

APPENDIX
Excerpts of Charter School Operators' Legal Responsibilities Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act As Amended in 1997 and the Charter School Expansion Act of 1998

List of Tables

Table 1
Distribution of selection variables in population of charter schools and Westat sample
Table 2
Characteristics of charter schools in the total population and the Westat sample
Table 3
Reasons parents of students with disabilities enroll their children in charter schools, as reported by parents and administrators
Table 4
Reasons students did or did not want to attend the charter school, as reported by students
Table 5
Differences between charter schools and previously-attended non-charter schools, as reported by parents, charter school staff, and students
Table 6
Goals for students with disabilities, as reported by parents and charter school staff
Table 7
Student assessment methods in charter schools, as reported by staff
Table 8
Factors that facilitate success for charter school students with disabilities, as reported by parents, charter school staff, and students
Table 9
Factors that impede success for charter school students with disabilities, as reported by parents, charter school staff, and students

Acknowledgments

Our work would not have been possible without the generous support of charter school administrators, teachers, parents, and students. These individuals, in 32 schools in 15 states, took time from their busy schedules to talk with us and show us their programs. They described their determined and often inspiring attempts to improve public education. Although we do not name them, we greatly appreciate their assistance.

We would also like to thank the charter school practitioners who participated in an advisory meeting during the first months of the study. The following persons helped us identify the educational, management, and policy issues most important to charter schools as they serve students with disabilities:

Anne Alpert, Side By Side Community School, Wilton, CT
Liz Ash, Cheyenne Mountain Charter Academy, Colorado Springs, CO
Sarah Begor, Chicago Preparatory Charter School, Park Ridge, IL
Ellie Boyce, Bowling Green, Sacramento, CA
Jackie Garrett, Chance Charter School, Alachua, FL
Maureen Landry, Bayou Charter School, Houma, LA
Joy N'Daou, Chicago International Charter School, Chicago, IL
Judy Olkes, Schools With No Stopping Point, Madison, WI
Marcus Sherman, North Star Academy, Springfield, MA
Johanna Thomas, Excel Education Centers, Prescott, AZ
JoAnne Woodard, Sallie B. Howard Charter School, Wilson, NC

We want in particular to thank the U.S. Department of Education Project Officers who provided thoughtful guidance throughout the course of the study. They were Kelly Henderson and Jane C. Williams of the Office of Special Education Programs and Judith Anderson of the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. And we especially appreciate the many additional Department officials and the external reviewers who provided useful feedback to drafts of this report.

In addition to the report's authors, the study team included other researchers who made valuable contributions. The following individuals conducted site visits and contributed in various ways to data reporting and analysis: Erin Cashman, Christene Tashjian, and Sandra Hopfengardner Warren of Research Triangle Institute; Susan Marks, Patricia McKenna, Kathryn Morrison, and Lynn Newman of SRI International.

Tom Fiore
Project Director
Westat


Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

graphic
Home | Overview | News | Community | State Profiles | Federal Support | Resources

Send Us Feedback

See our disclaimer, copyright, privacy policy and helpful details about this site.