Contents
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
INTRODUCTION
PART I - DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Site Selection
Site Visit Procedures
Data Analysis
PART II - OVERVIEW OF VISITED SCHOOLS
Localism
Evolution
Facilities
Curriculum and Instruction
Staffing and Leadership
Students
PART III - FINDINGS REGARDING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Why Parents Enroll Their Children with Disabilities in Charter Schools:
Students Attitudes Toward Enrolling in a Charter School
Pre-admission Counseling Related to Disability
How Charter Schools Serve Students with Disabilities:
Identifying Students with Disabilities
Instructional Setting
Instruction
Related Services
Transportation
Overview of Differences between Charter and Non-Charter Schools
Outcome Goals for Students:
Differences Between Goals for Students With and Without Disabilities
Assessment of Student Outcomes:
Differences Between Assessment for Students With and Without Disabilities
The Success of Charter Schools with Students with Disabilities:
Anecdotal Evidences of Success
Some Limits to Success
Integration
Facilitators of Success
Barriers to Success
PART IV - CONCLUSIONS
General Conclusions About Charter Schools
Conclusions Related to Students with Disabilities:
Enrollment Decisions
Attitudes Toward Special education and Students with Disabilities
Identifying Students with Disabilities
Academic and Related Services
Assessment and Accountability
Evidence of Student Success
Factors Affecting Student Success
APPENDIX
Excerpts of Charter School Operators' Legal Responsibilities Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act As Amended in 1997 and the Charter School Expansion Act of 1998
List of Tables
Table 1
Distribution of selection variables in population of charter schools and Westat sample
Table 2
Characteristics of charter schools in the total population and the Westat sample
Table 3
Reasons parents of students with disabilities enroll their children in charter schools, as reported by parents and administrators
Table 4
Reasons students did or did not want to attend the charter school, as reported by students
Table 5
Differences between charter schools and previously-attended non-charter schools, as reported by parents, charter school staff, and students
Table 6
Goals for students with disabilities, as reported by parents and charter school staff
Table 7
Student assessment methods in charter schools, as reported by staff
Table 8
Factors that facilitate success for charter school students with disabilities, as reported by parents, charter school staff, and students
Table 9
Factors that impede success for charter school students with disabilities, as reported by parents, charter school staff, and students
Acknowledgments
Our work would not have been possible without the generous support of charter school administrators, teachers, parents, and students. These individuals, in 32 schools in 15 states, took time from their busy schedules to talk with us and show us their programs. They described their determined and often inspiring attempts to improve public education. Although we do not name them, we greatly appreciate their assistance.
We would also like to thank the charter school practitioners who participated in an advisory meeting during the first months of the study. The following persons helped us identify the educational, management, and policy issues most important to charter schools as they serve students with disabilities:
Anne Alpert, Side By Side Community School, Wilton, CT
Liz Ash, Cheyenne Mountain Charter Academy, Colorado Springs, CO
Sarah Begor, Chicago Preparatory Charter School, Park Ridge, IL
Ellie Boyce, Bowling Green, Sacramento, CA
Jackie Garrett, Chance Charter School, Alachua, FL
Maureen Landry, Bayou Charter School, Houma, LA
Joy N'Daou, Chicago International Charter School, Chicago, IL
Judy Olkes, Schools With No Stopping Point, Madison, WI
Marcus Sherman, North Star Academy, Springfield, MA
Johanna Thomas, Excel Education Centers, Prescott, AZ
JoAnne Woodard, Sallie B. Howard Charter School, Wilson, NC
We want in particular to thank the U.S. Department of Education Project Officers who provided thoughtful guidance throughout the course of the study. They were Kelly Henderson and Jane C. Williams of the Office of Special Education Programs and Judith Anderson of the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. And we especially appreciate the many additional Department officials and the external reviewers who provided useful feedback to drafts of this report.
In addition to the report's authors, the study team included other researchers who made valuable contributions. The following individuals conducted site visits and contributed in various ways to data reporting and analysis: Erin Cashman, Christene Tashjian, and Sandra Hopfengardner Warren of Research Triangle Institute; Susan Marks, Patricia McKenna, Kathryn Morrison, and Lynn Newman of SRI International.
Tom Fiore
Project Director
Westat
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11


