Abstract: This paper outlines a range of approaches a state might try to improve charter authorizer practice through accountability. A state might increase authorizer accountability by forcing authorizers to provide more data and transparency; focusing on management reviews; focusing on outcomes; or, creating a marketplace of competing authorizers. The author warns that any new authorizer accountability practice needs to be crafted with caution as there is the potential for several negative consequences, including reviews by bureaucrats who do not understand or support chartering and authorizer policies that discourage sponsors from taking reasonable risks for the sake of innovation. She suggests that one reasonable strategy is to start with the least intense approach—mandated disclosure—and see if the resulting improvements are sufficient to protect students and the integrity of the charter school experiment. If not, other approaches should be tried.
Resource Type: Research/ Reports (Non Federal), Information for Charter Authorizers Resource Format: PDF File Target Audience: Authorizers, Policy Makers, Researchers Resource Topic: Accountability
Print
This Page