--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spacer Return to Web VersionspacerReturn to Web Version

Apples to Apples: An Evaluation of Charter Schools Serving General Student Populations

View: http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_01.htm
Date: 2003, July
By: Greene, Jay, Greg Forster, and Marcus Winters
Publisher: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research

Focus Area:  Accountability

Abstract:  This is the first major study of charter schools that compares test scores at charter schools and regular public schools serving similar (general) student populations. The authors exclude "targeted" charter schools, i.e, those serving very specific populations (juvenile offenders, pregnant teens, extremely low-income students) on the grounds that these skew achievement data downward. When measured against those public schools with similar demographic and geographic characteristics, charter schools produced slightly higher gains in math and reading over a one-year period, according to this study released in July 2003. Nationwide, charter schools on average exceeded public school scores by 3 points on math tests and 2 points on reading exams.

Resource Type:  Research/ Reports (Non Federal)
Resource Format:  Online Document
Target Audience:  Authorizers, Administrators, Parents, Policy Makers, Researchers
Resource Topic:  Accountability, Effectiveness of Charter Schools