| Give Up Control to Gain More Influence |
6/9/04 6:42 AM |
Author:
Mark Cannon
|
 |
Research and experience are beginning to show state and district authorizers that they can serve needs through chartering that are not being amply fulfilled through traditional public schools, such as:
* educational effectiveness
* economic efficiency (charter schools operate on fewer public dollars)
* diversity and innovation
* parental support
* control (e.g., meaningful oversight)
Regarding this last point, in small school districts from Barnstable, Massachusetts to Chula Vista, California and large urban districts from New York City to Philadelphia to Chicago charter schools are blazing a trail of innovation that is beginning to impact the governance and management of all schools in their system. The focus becomes less one of compliance reporting and more about fostering unique school environments that can best respond to and meet the needs of students. Thus, the central office gains more meaningful influence (i.e., control) over outcomes by retaining less hands-on control over inputs.
Such points are discussed in the following article by NACSA associate director William Haft and former board member Otho Tucker ...
http://www.charterauthorizers.org/files/nacsa/Commentaries/nasbe-fall03article.pdf
Posted as a reply to:
Reframing the Question by Deborah McGriff
|
|